A vision of Britain from 1801 to now.
Including maps, statistical trends and historical descriptions.
1961 Census of England and Wales, County Report (Sample Report Title: Census 1961: England and Wales: County Report: Kent), Table 3 : " Acreage, Population, Private Households and Dwellings for LAA, Wards, CP in RD, Con, NT".
Show top level table | Hemsworth | Show West Riding AdmC table |
---|
Click on the unit name for its home page If appears click for more detailed statistics |
Acreage [1] |
Population |
Private households and dwellings, 1961 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1951 |
1961 |
Private households [7] |
Population in private households [8] |
Structurally separate dwellings occupied [9] |
Rooms occupied [10] |
Density of occupation |
|||||||
Persons [2] |
Persons [3] |
Males [4] |
Females [5] |
Persons per Acre [6] |
Persons per room [11] |
Percentage of Persons at more than 1.5 per room [12] |
|||||||
Hemsworth RD Total | 29,019 | 48,392 | 51,665 | 25,963 | 25,702 | 1 | 15,336 | 51,538 | 15,293 | 72,836 | 0 | - | Hemsworth AP/CP | 4,163 | 13,657 | 14,413 | 7,207 | 7,206 | 3 | 4,173 | 14,142 | 4,169 | 18,745 | 0 | - | Ackworth CP/AP | 2,645 | 4,360 | 4,089 | 2,001 | 2,088 | 1 | 1,324 | 4,070 | 1,324 | 6,457 | 0 | 4 | Badsworth CP/AP | 1,547 | 160 | 192 | 99 | 93 | 0 | 61 | 192 | 61 | 306 | 0 | 3 | Billingley CP/Tn | 863 | 120 | 136 | 64 | 72 | 0 | 44 | 136 | 44 | 228 | 0 | 6 | Brierley CP/Tn | 2,583 | 7,090 | 8,259 | 4,188 | 4,071 | 3 | 2,314 | 8,217 | 2,314 | 11,239 | 0 | 7 | Great Houghton Tn/CP | 1,649 | 2,277 | 2,265 | 1,104 | 1,161 | 1 | 706 | 2,265 | 703 | 3,287 | 0 | 7 | Havercroft With Cold Hiendley CP/Tn | 1,364 | 1,947 | 2,792 | 1,434 | 1,358 | 2 | 753 | 2,792 | 753 | 3,720 | 0 | 7 | Hessle and Hill Top CP | 900 | 135 | 129 | 66 | 63 | 0 | 40 | 129 | 40 | 201 | 0 | 0 | Huntwick With Foulby and Nostell CP/Tn | 1,189 | 336 | 300 | 145 | 155 | 0 | 102 | 291 | 102 | 523 | 0 | 0 | Kirk Smeaton AP/CP | 1,700 | 208 | 178 | 86 | 92 | 0 | 70 | 176 | 70 | 318 | 0 | 2 | Little Houghton Tn/CP | 669 | 669 | 1,008 | 506 | 502 | 1 | 287 | 1,008 | 287 | 1,401 | 0 | 5 | Little Smeaton Tn/CP | 1,043 | 282 | 262 | 129 | 133 | 0 | 76 | 262 | 75 | 386 | 0 | 2 | North Elmsall CP/Tn | 2,117 | 4,076 | 3,543 | 1,773 | 1,770 | 1 | 977 | 3,534 | 975 | 4,761 | 0 | 8 | Ryhill CP/Tn | 592 | 2,649 | 2,446 | 1,211 | 1,235 | 4 | 792 | 2,446 | 792 | 3,313 | 0 | 5 | Shafton Tn/CP | 830 | 1,860 | 2,272 | 1,133 | 1,139 | 2 | 699 | 2,272 | 696 | 3,389 | 0 | 4 | South Elmsall CP/Tn | 1,426 | 7,389 | 7,385 | 3,687 | 3,698 | 5 | 2,349 | 7,356 | 2,334 | 10,875 | 0 | 5 | South Hiendley Tn/CP | 1,291 | 1,527 | 1,425 | 705 | 720 | 1 | 442 | 1,425 | 442 | 2,010 | 0 | 6 | South Kirkby CP/Tn/AP | 2,362 | 11,490 | 12,222 | 6,223 | 5,999 | 5 | 3,487 | 12,205 | 3,468 | 16,372 | 0 | 7 | Thorpe Audlin Tn/CP | 1,310 | 311 | 313 | 156 | 157 | 0 | 89 | 313 | 89 | 439 | 0 | 12 | Upton CP/Tn | 1,114 | 1,368 | 2,358 | 1,206 | 1,152 | 2 | 695 | 2,358 | 695 | 3,461 | 0 | 4 | Walden Stubbs Tn/CP | 1,373 | 120 | 71 | 40 | 31 | 0 | 24 | 71 | 24 | 119 | 0 | 10 | West Hardwick Tn/CP | 452 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 5 | 31 | 0 | 0 | Wintersett Tn/CP | 1,050 | 55 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 9 | 32 | 9 | 52 | 0 | 19 |
Click on the triangles for all about a particular number.
Using data from this table, Vision of Britain can map the following rates for within Hemsworth RD:
Rate | Date |
---|---|
Population Density (Persons per Acre) | 1961 |
Rate of Population Change (% over previous 10 years) | 1961 |
This website does not try to provide an exact replica of the original printed census tables, which often had thousands of rows and far more columns than will fit on our web pages. Instead, we let you drill down from national totals to the most detailed data available. The column headings are those that appeared in the original printed report. The numbers presented here, which are the same ones we use to create statistical maps and graphs, come from the census table and have usually been carefully checked.
The system can only hold statistics for units listed in our administrative gazetteer, so some rows from the original table may be missing. Sometimes big low-level units, like urban parishes, were divided between more than one higher-level units, like Registration sub-Districts. This is why some pages will give a higher figure for a lower-level unit: it covers the whole of the lower-level unit, not just the part within the current higher-level unit.