Vision of Britain | 1961 Census: County Report

1961 Census of England and Wales, County Report (Sample Report Title: Census 1961: England and Wales: County Report: Kent), Table 3 : " Acreage, Population, Private Households and Dwellings for LAA, Wards, CP in RD, Con, NT".

Show top level table	Loddon	Show Norfolk AdmC table

Click on the unit name for its home page If appears click for more detailed statistics	Acreage [1]	Population					Private households and dwellings, 1961
		1951	1961				Private households [7]	Population in private households [8]	Structurally separate dwellings occupied [9]	Rooms occupied [10]	Density of occupation
		Persons [2]	Persons [3]	Males [4]	Females [5]	Persons per Acre [6]	Private households [7]	Population in private households [8]	Structurally separate dwellings occupied [9]	Rooms occupied [10]	Persons per room [11]	Percentage of Persons at more than 1.5 per room [12]
Loddon RD Total	60,406	12,581	12,113	5,841	6,272	0	4,069	11,864	4,066	20,813	0	-
Aldeby AP/CP	3,084	526	478	236	242	0	162	478	161	842	0	2
Alpington CP/AP	539	155	161	88	73	0	55	161	55	271	0	0
Ashby St Mary CP/AP	503	163	172	87	85	0	59	172	59	297	0	0
Bedingham CP/AP	1,366	188	152	77	75	0	54	152	54	278	0	0
Bergh Apton AP/CP	1,988	402	430	206	224	0	151	430	151	728	0	1
Brooke AP/CP	2,153	643	695	345	350	0	231	695	231	1,121	0	7
Broome CP/AP	1,458	428	424	196	228	0	155	424	155	774	0	2
Burgh St Peter CP/AP	2,029	259	212	105	107	0	78	212	78	429	0	4
Carleton St Peter AP/CP	786	68	48	28	20	0	16	48	16	87	0	0
Chedgrave AP/CP	871	322	399	194	205	0	129	387	129	670	0	1
Claxton AP/CP	1,007	195	170	81	89	0	52	170	52	259	0	5
Ditchingham AP/CP	2,117	1,141	1,059	474	585	0	359	990	359	1,837	0	4
Ellingham AP/CP	1,392	362	363	171	192	0	125	363	125	644	0	0
Geldeston CP/AP	842	328	338	158	180	0	133	338	133	632	0	0
Gillingham CP	2,033	478	468	230	238	0	164	468	164	788	0	0
Haddiscoe AP/CP	4,858	507	472	259	213	0	170	472	169	908	0	1
Hales CP/AP	986	247	317	148	169	0	104	317	104	528	0	0
Heckingham CP/AP	1,099	381	273	63	210	0	45	131	45	232	0	0
Hedenham CP/AP	1,802	229	195	91	104	0	66	195	66	345	0	0
Hellington CP/AP	528	114	85	38	47	0	25	85	25	125	0	9
Howe CP/AP	790	95	58	29	29	0	24	58	24	120	0	0
Kirby Cane CP/AP	1,512	306	299	142	157	0	113	299	113	550	0	4
Kirstead CP/AP	1,034	149	171	80	91	0	60	171	60	307	0	4
Langley With Hardley CP	3,730	500	406	215	191	0	134	403	134	668	0	0
Loddon AP/CP	2,918	1,082	1,242	603	639	0	425	1,228	425	2,214	0	2
Mundham CP/AP	1,562	183	164	82	82	0	54	164	54	274	0	3
Norton Subcourse CP/AP	2,233	366	302	151	151	0	101	302	101	502	0	1
Raveningham AP/CP	1,984	318	236	120	116	0	79	236	79	445	0	0
Seething AP/CP	1,675	294	281	148	133	0	92	281	92	502	0	0
Sisland CP/AP	469	55	53	26	27	0	14	53	14	92	0	0
Stockton CP/AP	903	82	78	43	35	0	25	78	25	134	0	0
Thurlton AP/CP	1,285	398	341	168	173	0	126	341	126	661	0	1
Thurton AP/CP	783	238	287	139	148	0	87	287	87	417	0	0
Thwaite AP/CP	681	103	83	42	41	0	22	83	22	124	0	13
Tofts Monks CP/AP	1,693	375	328	161	167	0	104	328	104	578	0	0
Topcroft AP/CP	1,917	360	264	128	136	0	75	264	75	388	0	6
Wheatacre AP/CP	1,066	112	113	53	60	0	42	113	42	237	0	0
Woodton CP/AP	2,185	337	392	185	207	0	130	392	129	650	0	6
Yelverton AP/CP	545	92	104	51	53	0	29	95	29	155	0	5

Click on the triangles for all about a particular number.

Using data from this table, Vision of Britain can map the following rates for within Loddon RD:

Rate	Date
Population Density (Persons per Acre)	1961
Rate of Population Change (% over previous 10 years)	1961

This website does not try to provide an exact replica of the original printed census tables, which often had thousands of rows and far more columns than will fit on our web pages. Instead, we let you drill down from national totals to the most detailed data available. The column headings are those that appeared in the original printed report. The numbers presented here, which are the same ones we use to create statistical maps and graphs, come from the census table and have usually been carefully checked.

The system can only hold statistics for units listed in our administrative gazetteer, so some rows from the original table may be missing. Sometimes big low-level units, like urban parishes, were divided between more than one higher-level units, like Registration sub-Districts. This is why some pages will give a higher figure for a lower-level unit: it covers the whole of the lower-level unit, not just the part within the current higher-level unit.